H-6 bomber
- Russia, China, Latest News

China-Russia joint patrol highlighted limitations of Chinese bombers


  • Range and payload compared with Russian and US counterparts mean China’s bombers cannot be viewed as long-distance strategic bombers, expert says
  • China is developing next-generation bombers to extend its military reach
A joint patrol between China and Russia has underlined shortcomings of Chinese bombers that could hold back Beijing’s ambitions, analysts have said.

Four Chinese H-6Ks and two Russian Tu-95s took part in a joint patrol over the western Pacific on Tuesday as part of an annual programme of military cooperation, China’s defence ministry said.

The exercise was meant to show solidarity between the two nations as they both face sanctions and pressure from the United States.

A Chinese H-6K strategic bomber, viewed from a Russian jet during Tuesday’s joint patrol. Photo: AP

However, the Chinese bombers have limited range and payload compared with their Russian counterparts, and analysts said the contrast had implications for China’s capabilities.

 has 160 to 180 H-6 bombers, among the most advanced in China. They have a range of 6,000km (3,728 miles) and a wing loading of 160kg (353lbs) per square metre. Among all the H-6 bomber variants, only the H-6N variant is capable of being refuelled in the air, resulting in a clear range weakness.

The Russian Tu-95 is a strategic bomber and missile platform with a range of 15,000km and a wing loading of 606kg per square metre.

China is developing its next-generation H-20 bombers – subsonic stealth bombers designed to give the country an intercontinental capacity, expanding its reach far beyond its seaboard.

The H-20, designed to carry four stealth or hypersonic cruise missiles, has an estimated range of about 8,500km and a payload of 45 tonnes.

Russian strategic bomber the Tu-160 has a range of 12,300km and a wing loading of 742kg per square metre, while the American supersonic bomber the B-1 Lancer can fly 9,400km with a wing loading of 820kg per square metre.

Jon Grevatt, a warplane specialist and Asia-Pacific defence analyst at defence industry publisher Janes, pointed out that the limitations in range and payload of the Chinese H-6 bombers would reduce China’s ability to flex its muscles.

“The Chinese H-6 bomber is based on a very old Russian bomber called the Tu-16 Badger, which was introduced in the 1950s,” he said. “Although China has updated it, it’s basically still a very old design.

“Chinese bombers cannot fly as far without refuelling and cannot carry as heavy a payload as Russian and US bombers.”

During Tuesday’s exercise, the six Chinese and Russian bombers entered the air defence identification zone around the South Korea-controlled Dokdo Islands, which are also claimed by Japan. Both nations scrambled fighter jets to track the Russian and Chinese bombers.

According to a photograph taken by the Japan Air Self-Defence Force, China deployed a new variant of the H-6K bomber with eight wing pylons instead of the six commonly seen in H-6 bombers.

Song Zhongping, a former Chinese military instructor, said the two pylons near the tips of the wings could be used to carry light weapons such as airborne electronic jamming pods, while the other six pylons could carry heavier bombs or missiles.

A jamming pod is an electronic device designed to trick or deceive radar, sonar or other detection systems.

But Song said a lack of stealth capability made it difficult for Chinese bombers to penetrate foreign defence systems. “The H-6 bombers cannot be seen as true long-distance strategic bombers,” he said.

The first China-Russia long-range joint air patrol in the Asia-Pacific region was held in July last year, and triggered hundreds of warning shots from South Korea and a strong protest from Japan.

Grevatt said the joint patrol could help China enhance its military tactics and collaboration between air forces.

“It can also send out a strategic message to the United States that China and Russia are willing and able to collaborate,” he said.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *